保留原結構vs大拆大改：點樣用「玩中學」概念活化舊居？

香港舊樓翻新經常遇到兩難：要唔要保留原始結構？拆晒重建一了百了，定係盡量保留舊有元素，既環保又有個性？最近睇到冰島一個發電廠改造項目，將成個園區變成「learning by playing」嘅開放式博物館，啟發咗我哋一個諗法：與其盲目跟風拆牆改間隔，不如學吓點樣用保留嘅結構，創造互動同學習嘅空間。今日就從設計知識角度，客觀分析保留原結構嘅利弊，同埋常見嘅物料謬誤。

CLAY Interior Design — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

保留原始結構的三大好處（與注意事項）

常見謬誤：以為保留就等於唔使處理

如何用「玩中學」概念佈局？

物料選擇建議

Image source: 設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

Image source: 設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

Image source: 設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

Image source: 設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

Image source: 設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing"

---

靈感來源：設計部落格 — Terta transforms decommissioned power station in Iceland into colourful site for "learning by playing" by Jon Astbury

原文連結：https://www.dezeen.com/2026/07/05/terta-ellidaarstod-power-station/